Skip to main content

Critical Thinking

 I'm glad you brought that up. It's a teen we liked to bandy about. I don't use it much anymore. It's been weaponzized, and I'm developing an aversion to the use if weaponzized language. It's not useful in any positive sense. I'm sure it peppers my own speech still without me realizing it, but I'm trying to train myself to recognize it.

I don't think someone who's truly a critical thinker ever finds a place to land, rarely finds a group.

I think it's safe to say you've ceased to be a critical thinker when your default for every incident is the alternative or least popular explanation. 

You're not a critical thinker when any professional who agrees with what you've decided is truth automatically has cred and becomes the authority in your book.

You're not a critical thinker when you dismiss out of hand or ignore what doesn't square with your perspective and actively search for and elevate what does.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

White people feel like they shouldn't have to pay a price for their crimes

 And are always about letting one another get off scot free unless they're if a different political persuasion. For instance, you think you and those alongside you don't deserve hard punishment even though you traumatized, injured, and killed people and invaded a federal building and elected representatives because you were fighting for a 'noble' and urgent cause, but you want people of color punished for lesser crimes even though they believe their cause is just as noble and urgent. It has always been that way. White people have always characterized black people as violent or criminals but excuse themselves for the propensity for not just violence but for subjugation entire races, cultures, and countries and committing crimes against humanity worldwide. They are the school shooters, the serial killers, the bombers of public spaces,the harmers of masses of innocent people just to make a statement. That's as white as white can be. Anything white people do is okay, an...
Post a Comment
Read more

We don't have to opine on everything.

We really don't. I think social media is what's responsible. It's got us thinking that we need to voice our opinion on everything that happens and everything that said and done when really we don't need to at all. And then we feel the need to respond to others' responses. Why? Our opinion about what goes on in the world isn't always relevant, is frequently not well enough informed, and is almost always precipitous and unnecessary. And the media feels like they have so much air and space to fill, because now news must be 24/7 and everywhere, that they fill interviews, columns, talks shows, etc. with opinion. They ask people what they think about what someone else said or posted and demand a reaction. What does it really matter what someone else thinks and why must others always weigh in? Take, for example, Naomi Osaka pullout. She said what she said, she gave her reasons, accepted the fine, and that should have been the end of it. But, no. It has to get talked to...
Post a Comment
Read more